When it comes to cochlear implant reliability, we’re continuously striving to deliver the most reliable implants possible. We don’t do this for a number on paper or a colorful chart—our goal is to deliver the best possible outcomes for every one of our recipients. We’re proud that our cochlear implants offer outstanding long-term reliability and outstanding hearing outcomes.
However, to help ensure the best patient outcomes possible, it is essential to follow proper surgical techniques—including creating an electrode lead channel during implantation. This bony channel is a highly effective way to protect the electrode lead from external impacts.
Today, Dr. Peter Roland will explain why he went back to drilling a bony channel for the electrode lead. Dr. Roland is an Emeritus Professor & Chairman of the Department of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. Dr. Roland is also surgical consultant & instructor at the MED-EL Surgical Academy. For complete surgical guidelines with all of our implants, please refer to the official MED-EL surgical guidelines.
Let’s go over to Dr. Roland.
Evolving Surgical Techniques: My Experience
Over the years, I followed the lead of other high-volume cochlear implant surgeons and became quite comfortable using a tight subperiosteal pocket to immobilize the implanted stimulator receiver, even though a recessed bed is recommended by the manufacture’s labeling.
Labeling, after all, is based on the technique used for the original pivotal clinical trials required for FDA approval. Surgical techniques advance, and yet the labeling often cannot be changed without additional clinical trials, which can be a rigorous process that takes several years and costs a lot money.
Provided the subperiosteal pocket is truly “tight” (which requires considerable care and that something is done to prevent anterior displacement, such as a low “ledge” of bone, suturing the periosteum to bone), I remain very confident that the subperiosteal pocket approach is reliable for most situations.
Previously, I had thought that the same reasoning applied to the recommendation to drill a bony channel for the electrode lead. At that time, I believed that the recommended electrode lead channel, like the bed for the stimulator receiver, was unnecessary and I stopped making a channel for the electrode lead.
Then I saw bench data on electrode lead wire fractures, which strongly suggested my assumption was wrong. The titanium receiver housing is robust and can withstand direct impact. However, the ultra-thin wires of the electrode array can be damaged by a direct impact if left unprotected. Wire fractures can occur as a result of impact trauma with all available electrodes. After seeing the product testing data, I changed back to fully recessing the electrode lead in a bony channel. With a proper electrode lead channel, the risk of impact wire fractures can be very effectively reduced. It doesn’t take long, and it gives me confidence that I have done all that I can to minimize the need for a revision operation secondary to impact wire fractures.
Ideally, the electrode lead should be fully recessed so that the most superficial portion of the lead lies deep to the surface of the cortical bone, as is suggested in the surgical manual.
